Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case legislation citation inside a state court might not be suitable, and even accepted, with the U.
fourteen. From the light of your position explained above, it is actually concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is established as well as employee is found guilty after due process of regulation, it is the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is not really suitable however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful method. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling a person to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-such neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving round the neighborhood trying to find their phone is likely to generally be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that while considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the advantage of every one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) read more Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple experienced two young children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair experienced younger children.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Additionally, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.